Here are some of the greatest threats facing the construction industry heading into 2026 — especially relevant for the AEC world you move in — along with how firms (and you, as a leader) might respond. I’ll frame each threat with what to watch + strategic implications for your role in the St. Louis/AEC community. In the following issues a deeper dive into each will be shared. Stay tuned in!

Summary Chart of Threats

Threat Key Concern Implication for AEC Firms
Labor shortage Lack of skilled workers Need workforce pipeline, training, diversity
Input costs/supply chain Material escalation, delays Smart procurement, risk clauses, local sourcing
Tech/productivity gap Low adoption of productivity tools Competitive disadvantage
Policy/interest/ESG risk Uncertainty, cost of compliance Contract and strategy adjustments
Sustainability/ESG Stranded assets, client demands Early adoption, lifecycle focus
Market segment slowdown Order book risks in some sectors Diversification, portfolio review
Changing delivery models Faster, modular, efficient delivery Embrace new methods to stay relevant

 

  1. Workforce & Skilled Trade Shortages

Why it matters: In Missouri, 77% of contractors cited rising labor-costs and 70% cited worker shortages as top concerns. MU Extension Aging craft-workers and fewer younger workers entering trades compound the issue.

What firms should do:

  • Partner with local trade schools, high schools and apprenticeship programs to build pipeline. Support the local efforts to start the process of trade careers early!
  • Offer cross-training and multi-skilling (so fewer people can cover more roles).
  • Consider modular or pre-fabrication methods (which reduce reliance on on-site craft labor).
  1. Rising Input Costs & Supply‐Chain Vulnerability

Why it matters: Material cost inflation, tariffs and logistics delays are national threats, and regional firms may feel them acutely when sourcing from global or long-haul supply-chains.

What firms should do:

  • Lock-in pricing or include escalation clauses in contracts.
  • Develop relationships with local/regional suppliers to reduce shipping risk.
  • Review inventory, lead-times, and alternative materials (while balancing quality).
  1. Slowing Growth in Key Segments / Over-exposure Risk

Why it matters: Forecasts show non-residential and manufacturing-facility construction spending may slow or decline in 2026. HPAC+2Atradius+2 For example, in the Midwest nonresidential starts are expected to ease after 2025. ConstructConnect News

What firms should do:

  • Examine their project mix: if heavily exposed to manufacturing or commercial office, consider shifting into infrastructure, renovation, or institutional work.
  • Diversify client base and delivery models.
  • Monitor bids and pipeline of work for signs of segment stress.
  1. Technology/Productivity Gap

Why it matters: Firms that haven’t adopted digital tools, modular methods or prefabrication risk falling behind in cost-productivity, scheduling and quality.

What firms should do:

  • Start small: pick one repeatable scope (e.g., bathroom pods, MEP racks) to pilot offsite assembly.
  • Invest in training for staff on BIM, data analytics, project-monitoring tools.
  • Measure productivity improvements (e.g., hours per unit installed, rework hours avoided).
  1. Policy / Regulatory & Financing Uncertainty

Why it matters: According to JLL, policy-driven market dynamics (tariffs, labour/immigration law changes, incentive regimes) are reshaping regional construction economics. JLL+1 Financing costs remain elevated, especially in regional markets.
What firms should do:

  • Stay plugged into regulatory updates (state labour/immigration/contract law changes).
  • Ensure contracts account for interest-rate risk, material escalation, site/permitting delays.
  • Build relationships with regional banks and bonding agents to secure better financing terms.
  1. Sustainability / ESG Requirements & Owner Expectations

Why it matters: Owners and investors increasingly demand low-carbon, resilient buildings and infrastructure. Failure to respond may lead to exclusion from certain bids or reputational challenges.

What firms should do:

  • Develop capability and credentials in sustainable construction (LEED, net-zero, lifecycle planning).
  • Track and quantify embodied carbon, energy performance and resilience for regional projects.
  • Use sustainability as a differentiator in proposals to win more forward-looking work.
  1. Contract Risk & Margin Pressure

Why it matters: With input-cost inflation, labor volatility and slower segment growth, margins are under siege. Also, insurance premiums and risk exposures are rising.

What firms should do:

  • Revisit contract terms: include escalation clauses, clear risk allocation, contingency buffers.
  • Review insurance coverage and risk management practices, ensure gaps are addressed.
  • Monitor project performance closely (cost, schedule, change orders) and react early to cost/cash-flow drift.
  1. Changing Delivery Models & Client Demands for Speed/Value

Why it matters: Clients want faster delivery, greater transparency, improved value — meaning firms sticking to old models may lose out.

What firms should do:

  • Adopt delivery models like Design-Build, Integrated Project Delivery (IPD), or lean construction techniques.
  • Invest in early planning and design for manufacture & assembly (DfMA).
  • Work on improving client communication, transparency around schedule/cost/quality.
  1. Regional Infrastructure & Labor Market Constraints

Why it matters: In the Midwest and Missouri region, infrastructure projects are substantial and firms may compete heavily for them — yet labor constraints, permitting/time delays, and regional supply bottlenecks pose threats. MU Extension+1

What firms should do:

  • Position themselves for infrastructure work by building relevant expertise (public work, water/wastewater, transportation).
  • Build alliances (subcontractor networks, joint ventures) to scale capacity when bids emerge.
  • Track regional pipeline (state DOT, municipal, federal infrastructure spending) and allocate resources accordingly.
  1. Market & Economic Cycles / Capital Availability

Why it matters: Growth projections are modest for 2026; capital becomes more cautious; economic headwinds could lead to project delays or cancellations. Architect Magazine+1

What firms should do:

  • Maintain financial discipline: keep liquidity, reassess overhead, avoid over-commitment to long-tail contracts.
  • Monitor bid odds and pipeline health: prefer projects with committed funding and clear timelines.
  • Explore alternative markets (retrofit, renovations, resilient infrastructure) which may fare better in tighter cycles.

Final Thought

These threats translate into strategic imperatives: build resilience, sharpen execution, embrace technology/alternate delivery, and diversify.